Monday 9 December 2013

Apartheid and First Nations' Schooling

Children asking for a school
I remember hearing about South African Ambassador Glenn Babb, who was posted to Canada in 1985. When Babb compared the plight of First Nations people living on reserves to Blacks under apartheid, it was controversial and apparently former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was not amused. Since then, even Archbishop Desmond Tutu has looked at the similarities between the lives of Canada's First Nations people and Blacks in South Africa ('Apartheid envoy reviled in Canada', Globe and Mail, August 3, 2003).  According to some writers, notably Prof. John S. Saul of York University, this was no coincidence as much of the system of apartheid, particularly the Bantustan, was modeled on our First Nations reserves.  Now two decades after the fall of apartheid in South Africa, here we are in Canada with remnants of a dreaded apartheid-lite system still in place.

This is strong language but given the current circumstances and the history of residential schools, it is appropriate.  There are children in Canada who are treated in a discriminatory manner because of their race. These are the children who live on reserves under federal jurisdiction, where education is funded at a lower rate than for schooling under provincial jurisdictions. In fact, we don't actually know how much money reserves receive for education since, as I understand it, much is skimmed off the top for native research in universities and for administration. The federal government has not been forthcoming with the actual amount reserves receive on a per student basis.

In fact, at least 100 schools on reserves are considered unsafe, according National Panel on First Nation Elementary and Secondary Education.  Almost two years after its report was tabled,  it appears from an internet search that only a school in Attawapiskat has been built and after some delay, this school is scheduled to be completed by June 2014.

Let's take a moment to examine the proposed First Nations Education Act, originally scheduled to be tabled in January.  Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt is now less clear as to when this legislation will come forward but if it does, it will be without consultation or buy-in from First Nations peoples.  After the disastrous history of residential schools in Canada, one would think that the federal government would want First Nations to be at the table to give some credibility to the proposal.  Instead the bill was written without prior consultation and Valcourt says he's now consulting -- on a piece of legislation that has already been written.  How could this after-the-fact consultation be seen by aboriginal leaders, particularly those with memories of residential schools, as anything other than a sign of bad faith?  

The proposed act allows the Minister to impose third-party advisors to administer reserve schools that do not meet certain standards.  The standards to be met are not spelled out in the proposed bill and it is likely that the cost for these advisors will come out of already meager reserve school funds.

Finally, there was no indication of increased reserve school funding in the Budget (see an earlier post) nor is there in this proposed legislation.  Without funding tied to actual need, including the socio-economic needs of children on reserves, there can be no improvement in student achievement.  On-reserve teachers are often paid far less and as a consequence, they tend to be new teachers without experience.  As well, there is no money for the other educational support staff that children, particularly needier children, typically require to succeed in school.  These include special education teachers, psychologists and social workers.  

We have student drives in many of our Ottawa schools to send books to reserves as there aren't any books. There is no money for libraries.  No money for sports facilities. And as I mentioned earlier, no money to provide even safe facilities.

These are fourth-world conditions in Ontario, for heaven's sake.  Northern Ontario reserves where the standard of living is so low that tuberculosis (TB) is still rampant. Health Canada states that:
For example, while the 2006 Census reports that Aboriginal peoples account for just under 4% of the Canadian population, 21% of all TB cases occurred in this population in 2008.
Most people including most First Nations leadership believe that education is the remedy to breaking the chain of poverty, illness and despair for aboriginal people.  Nelson Mandela also believed that education is the key for his people.  Are we fair-minded Canadians, who were willing to champion fairness for Black people halfway across the world, going to simply watch as our government continues to discriminate against First Nations people here at home?

I can no longer stand by and allow my government to enact a piece of legislation that I know is just plain wrong. I hope you will also look within your conscience and find a way to tell the government your opinion on this proposed bill.  See Shannen's Dream, a student supported initiative, for more information.  Or you can join with others seeking justice and fair funding for First Nations' education at a rally tomorrow, December 10 -- 11 am at Victoria Island or noon on Parliament Hill.  Enough is enough!



The views expressed in this post are personal opinions only.

6 comments:

  1. Just to give some dollar amounts:
    “Many non-Aboriginal Canadians assume that generous amounts of money flow to reserves and schools on reserves are generously funded compared to non-reserve based schools. This is incorrect” (Mendelson, 2006, p.2). In fact, on-reserve schools receive a fraction of what provincially funded schools receive. The federal government uses a ‘reverse formula’ that results in much lower contributions. Each year bands must petition INAC to receive their operating funds. Unlike the provinces, who establish a base per capita funding rate and multiply this by the number of students enrolled, INAC divides the amount of funding by the number of students to determine the per capita rate (Phillips, 2011, p.233). Essentially, this results in a significant funding gap between students on reserve than their provincially funded counterparts. In one case, these funding shortfalls show INAC providing $8,156 to a First nation school (Pic River) compared to $15,211.53 per student to attend a nearby provincial school (Marathon) for elementary education and $17,131.88 for secondary education (Philiips, 2011, p.238). Moreover, Ottawa’s education funding has been kept to a ceiling of 2% a year since 1996. An analysis of the enrollment on reserves shows that the funding would have had to increase by 3% to a year from 1996 to 2003 to remain stable in terms of inflation (Mendelson, 2006, p. 2)."

    source: Lee, D (2012) Examining Social Policy of On-reserve First Nation’s Education, University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Thanks Dawna. It's so arbitrary, complicated and worse than even I thought. What about capital funding -- in other words are reserves expected to do repairs, renovations and school construction with this money too?

      Delete
  2. Yes, FN reserves are expected to pay for operations and infrastructure. They can apply for funding to build a school, but given the small amount of funds and the many bands applying for funding in a region its unlikely they would ever receive enough funds to adequately address repairs let alone build a school. So, within the Atlantic region (NL, NS, NB, PEI) the bands are competing for a portion of the available monies and there is very little available. According to the Aboriginal Affairs & Northern Development website, "First Nations are the owners and operators of infrastructure on reserve and, as such, they are responsible for the operation, maintenance, and minor renovations to their schools.For larger projects (over $1.5 million), First Nations can submit to INAC a sound multi-year infrastructure investment plan for funding assistance."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With the provincial funding model in Ontario, school boards receive a per student amount for school operations plus grants for particular purposes plus capital funding for certain types of renovations or school construction. While it's hard to compare, I'm fairly certain that the amounts received in total by the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board would be greater on a per student basis. And we have lower costs overall because of our greater student numbers and our southern location.

      Delete
  3. Nice bit of research from this paper re: infrastructure funding (http://www.parl.gc.ca/PBO-DPB/documents/INAC_Final_EN.pdf)

    "It is important for Parliamentarians to note that there are no monies separately appropriated by the Parliament for funding First Nations school infrastructure. The department works with an internal national Long-Term Capital Plan under the Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program (CFMP) for funding school infrastructure."

    "According to the internal INAC ICMS database, there are 803 schools on First Nations
    reserves, of which 10 schools are listed as ―Closed‖. Athough, some of these schools
    have their year of construction dating back all the way to the 18th century ,most of them
    have been constructed since the 1960s. While the rate of new school construction
    averaged close to 35 new schools per year during the 1990 -2000 period, this rate has dropped in recent years. Since the year 2006, only 8 new schools have been built according to the ICMS database"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shame! By way of comparison, we have 147 school sites in the Ottawa public English board. Not that every year is the same but in 2013, we received funding for 8 projects for either new school construction or for major renovations.

      Delete